• Home
  • Keep it North Saanich
Keep it North Saanich
  • Rural By Choice
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
  • Rural By Choice
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
Keep it North Saanich
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest Post

“You Can’t Be a Little Bit Pregnant”: Why North Saanich Should Not Budge on Its Boundary

by KeepItNorthSaanich
July 27, 2026
0
6
SHARES
158
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Few planning questions are more consequential for North Saanich, or for Canada, than where the line between urban sprawl and rural ecosystems is drawn. The urban containment boundary (UCB) is not merely a zoning or administrative matter. It is about the kind of community North Saanich is and the environmental and human amenities it provides.

It is about the economic value North Saanich adds to the regional and national economy. It is about Canada losing farmland while North Saanich adds new farmers to the sector. It is about Canada’s climate obligations, and North Saanich doing its bit to meet them.

North Saanich Already Has a Housing Plan: The Official Community Plan

Moving the UCB overlooks the fact that North Saanich already has a plan. Not an idea, but a people-led, resident-owned Official Community Plan, adopted in 2025.

The OCP does not reject growth. Its housing strategy is evidence-based, directing density to locations that already have infrastructure, transport and social amenities, places where new housing entrants can build a good life with affordable housing. It fosters a resilient local food and agricultural system in a municipality where over 30% of land is set aside for this purpose. The OCP notes that many residents already use their residential property to produce food and the thriving North Saanich Farmers Market is evidence of this. Lastly, the North Saanich plan for housing maintains compact settlement, and makes the district’s rural qualities work with local natural ecosystems.

What CBRE Is Proposing, and Why Residents Rejected It

That approach is under attack at council, where development interests led by CBRE, the Dallas-based international property conglomerate, have lobbyists pushing for “a little bit” of change to the UCB. As one resident said at the last council meeting, you can’t make a small change to the UCB any more than you can be a little bit pregnant.

Residents have roundly rejected proposals to extend the boundary into North Saanich and introduce substantially greater density in an ad hoc fashion: apartment buildings of up to six storeys, sixplexes and fourplexes, more units on existing single-family lots, and smaller minimum lot sizes. They point to nearby Langford as an example of what moving the line does to costs and quality of life, and they reject the resulting pressure on rural and agricultural lands.

The concern is not housing itself. It is about where housing should go, and who decides, when a formally consulted and adopted OCP already provides a plan that must be given time to work.

The Lungs of the Peninsula: Farmland, Ecosystems and Long-Term Value

North Saanich occupies a unique position on the Saanich Peninsula. Its agricultural lands feed the regional food system and buffer against farmland loss to sprawl. The OCP links agricultural resilience, compact settlement and ecosystem protection because residents do not see these as competing priorities. They are interconnected parts of a thriving long-term vision.

The phrase “lungs of the peninsula” captures it: green space and farmland serving a purpose well beyond municipal boundaries. Changing the urban containment boundary is about more than a line on a map. It is about whether growth works with the qualities that make North Saanich a distinctive and valued part of the Island, the region and Canada itself.

SOURCES:

https://www.connectnorthsaanich.ca/zoning-bylaw-update

https://ir.cbre.com

Official Community Plan (OCP)

Previous Post

Another Langford? No, Thank You

Next Post

Comment: Don’t rewrite regional plan to fit questionable housing target

KeepItNorthSaanich

KeepItNorthSaanich

Next Post
North Saanich's 419-unit housing target raises critical questions:

Comment: Don’t rewrite regional plan to fit questionable housing target

Categories

  • Latest Post
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
  • Rural By Choice
  • North Saanich residents spent years building an Official Community Plan that
  • Fox Guarding the Henhouse: Why Is a Global Real Estate Giant Deciding North Saanich
  • Canada
  • The urban containment boundary is non-negotiable. Here’s why.

North Saanich already has a plan. Not an idea, but a resident-led Official Community Plan adopted in 2025. It directs housing to places with existing infrastructure, protects over 30 percent of land for agriculture, and keeps communities livable.

But that plan is under attack. A Dallas-based real estate company is pushing council to expand the boundary and introduce ad hoc density increases: six-storey buildings, smaller lots, fewer safeguards.

Here’s the thing: residents aren’t rejecting growth. They’re rejecting growth without a plan, without community input, and without local control.

As one resident said at council, “You can’t make a small change to the urban containment boundary any more than you can be a little bit pregnant.”

The boundary isn’t just a line on a map. It’s about whether North Saanich’s agricultural lands continue to feed the regional food system. It’s about whether the district’s rural character survives. It’s about whether growth works with local ecosystems or against them.

Read more - article in comments below.

#KeepItNorthSaanich #RuralByChoice #northsaanichbc
  • North Saanich spent years building its new Official Community Plan with residents. It was adopted July 14, 2025. The OCP already sets housing targets, timelines, and affordability requirements. But now a $2-billion Dallas-based real estate company is pushing to rewrite it.

So why is CBRE trying to gut a plan that residents created, before it’s even had a chance to work?

𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡: what does North Saanich mean to you, and what are you willing to fight to protect?

Drop your thoughts in the comments. 

(Link to the full breakdown in the comments below👇)
  • Another Langford? No, Thank You

Langford was supposed to be BC’s housing success story: build fast, build big, solve the crisis. Instead, it’s becoming a warning.

In just five years, Langford’s property taxes have exploded: 2.95% in 2021, 2.95% in 2022, 12.41% in 2023, then a record-breaking 15.63% hike in 2024, followed by 9.77% in 2025 and 10.22% again in 2026. Three double-digit tax hikes in four years. That’s not bad luck. That’s the bill for growth that outran the infrastructure meant to support it.

Take Westhills, once open land, now home to thousands, which passed 1,000 homes almost overnight. Roads like Alouette Drive turned into commuter chokepoints so bad the city had to install speed bumps just to keep residents safe. Locals are now living through what officials openly call “construction fatigue”: noise, dust, traffic, and neighbourhoods that stopped feeling like home.

Even Langford’s own council admitted the pace had gotten away from them, which is why it adopted a new Official Community Plan in 2025 to try to bring order to growth that had already spiralled.

Now the same playbook is coming for North Saanich. A provincially appointed advisor, paid by a global real estate firm, is pushing six-storey buildings, an expanded Urban Containment Boundary, and less local oversight, in a district that just spent years building an Official Community Plan (OCP) to protect its rural character.

If Langford is any indication, this isn’t just about buildings. It’s about your tax bill. It’s about your roads. It’s about abandoning climate resilience just as the crisis accelerates. It’s about whether North Saanich still feels like North Saanich five years from now.

Read more keepitnorthsaanich.ca

#KeepItNorthSaanich #NorthSaanich #RuralByChoice #SaanichPeninsula #BCHousing
  • Tomorrow is it. After Wednesday, the comment window on the Housing Minister’s directives closes for good, and Council moves straight into drafting its final response.

If you’ve been putting it off, this is the last call. A few honest sentences about what North Saanich means to you is all it takes.

Email CorporateServices@northsaanich.ca and CC AllMayorandCouncil@northsaanich.ca before end of day Tuesday.

Details: keepitnorthsaanich.ca/north-saanich-council-wants-your-input-on-the-housing-ministers-demands-deadline-july-22/

#KeepItNorthSaanich #NorthSaanich #RuralByChoice
  • Three days. On Wednesday at 12pm the window closes and the record is what it is. If you’ve been meaning to speak up about the Housing Minister’s directives, this weekend is the time. What’s actually being demanded, why it matters, and exactly how to submit your comments, all in one place: 

Link in bio for details.
  • 𝐍𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐒𝐚𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬: you have until July 22 to submit public comments on the Housing Minister’s demands. Your submission will help inform Council’s response.

𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓’𝐒 𝐀𝐓 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄:

* The minister’s proposals would allow many times more housing than our targets actually require. (see North Saanich Housing Targets 2026)

* Provincial rules don’t let the District recover full infrastructure costs from developers; that shortfall lands on your property taxes. 

* The North Saanich OCP was crafted over more than a year of community input and consultation. It shouldn’t be pushed aside by a questionable report, written by US based global real estate company CBRE, acting as an advisor to North Saanich.

You don’t need to be an expert to weigh in. 

Say what North Saanich means to you and what you want protected.

Details and how to submit: 𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐬𝐚𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐡.𝐜𝐚

© 2026 Keep it North Saanich

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Keep it North Saanich

© 2026 Keep it North Saanich