• Home
  • Keep it North Saanich
Keep it North Saanich
  • Rural By Choice
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
  • Rural By Choice
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
Keep it North Saanich
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest Post

North Saanich Housing Targets 2026

by KeepItNorthSaanich
June 17, 2026
0
429
SHARES
3.3k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

North Saanich Housing Targets: What Story Do The Numbers Actually Tell

North Saanich has found itself under increasing pressure from the Province of British Columbia to accelerate housing construction. Recent news reports have focused on the municipality’s failure to meet provincial housing targets, with advisers recommending changes to increase housing supply and speed up development approvals.

The implication is clear: North Saanich is not building enough homes. But before accepting that conclusion, it is worth taking a closer look at the numbers.

According to the 2021 Census conducted by Statistics Canada, North Saanich’s population grew from 11,249 residents in 2016 to 12,235 residents in 2021. That’s an increase of 986 people, or 8.8 per cent over five years. During the same period, the number of occupied private dwellings increased from 4,626 to 5,010. In other words, North Saanich added 384 occupied homes, representing growth of 8.3 per cent.

The first thing that stands out is how closely those figures track one another. Population growth and housing growth moved almost in lockstep. The difference between them was less than half a percentage point. That does not suggest a municipality that has refused to build housing. On the contrary, it suggests that housing supply expanded alongside population growth over the most recent census period.

This is where the conversation becomes more interesting.

The Province has assigned North Saanich a housing target of 419 new homes by 2029, equivalent to roughly 84 homes per year. By comparison, census data indicates that the municipality added approximately 77 occupied dwellings annually between 2016 and 2021. The difference is not enormous. The provincial target is about nine per cent higher than North Saanich’s recent historical rate of housing growth.

Yet public discussion often creates the impression that North Saanich faces a dramatic housing deficit or has fundamentally resisted growth. The census data paints a more nuanced picture. The community grew. Housing grew. New residents were accommodated. The numbers do not support a narrative of zero growth or complete stagnation.

None of this means additional housing is unnecessary.

Population growth creates demand. Housing affordability remains a challenge across much of British Columbia. Younger residents and families often struggle to find suitable housing options within the communities where they grew up. These are real concerns. But they are only part of the story. What is largely missing from the current debate is a discussion about the purpose of growth and the character of the community that growth is intended to serve. North Saanich is not simply a housing market. It is a rural municipality with agricultural lands, environmentally sensitive areas, coastal ecosystems and a community identity that residents have repeatedly said they value.

The recently adopted Official Community Plan (OCP) reflects years of public consultation about how to balance these priorities. It acknowledges that growth will occur while emphasising stewardship, environmental protection, agricultural preservation and careful if not slow, planning. The question, therefore, is not whether North Saanich should grow. The data shows that it already has.

The more important question is how growth should occur and whether success should be measured solely by the number of housing units constructed. Housing targets provide one metric. Population growth provides another. Neither, by itself, tells us what kind of community North Saanich is or will become. That is ultimately a civic choice, not a statistical one. A choice already made in the detailed OCP. 

The numbers suggest that North Saanich has been growing steadily and that housing construction has broadly kept pace with population growth. They also suggest that the gap between historical housing delivery and provincial expectations may be smaller than public debate sometimes implies. As discussions about housing continue, residents would be well served by asking not only how many homes should be built, but what larger vision those homes are intended to support.

Because before we build the future, we should understand the numbers and what they are, and are not, telling us.

Sources:

Statistics Canada, Census Profile, North Saanich, British Columbia. Population increased from 11,249 (2016) to 12,235 (2021); occupied private dwellings increased from 4,626 to 5,010.

Statistics Canada, 2016 and 2021 Census Profiles for North Saanich, British Columbia.

Province of British Columbia Housing Targets Program (North Saanich target: 419 net new homes by 2029; Year 1 target: 60 homes)

Previous Post

Public shouldn’t be muzzled at North Saanich council

Next Post

One Person, All the Power: Residents Question New Approval Rules

KeepItNorthSaanich

KeepItNorthSaanich

Next Post
North Saanich quietly handed all approval power to one official.

One Person, All the Power: Residents Question New Approval Rules

Categories

  • Latest Post
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
  • Rural By Choice
  • Langford was supposed to be BC’s housing success story: build fast, build big, solve the crisis. Instead, it’s becoming a warning.

In just five years, Langford’s property taxes have exploded: 2.95% in 2021, 2.95% in 2022, 12.41% in 2023, then a record-breaking 15.63% hike in 2024, followed by 9.77% in 2025 and 10.22% again in 2026. Three double-digit tax hikes in four years. That’s not bad luck. That’s the bill for growth that outran the infrastructure meant to support it.

Take Westhills, once open land, now home to thousands, which passed 1,000 homes almost overnight. Roads like Alouette Drive turned into commuter chokepoints so bad the city had to install speed bumps just to keep residents safe. Locals are now living through what officials openly call “construction fatigue”: noise, dust, traffic, and neighbourhoods that stopped feeling like home.

Even Langford’s own council admitted the pace had gotten away from them, which is why it adopted a new Official Community Plan in 2025 to try to bring order to growth that had already spiralled.

Now the same playbook is coming for North Saanich. A provincially appointed advisor, paid by a global real estate firm, is pushing six-storey buildings, an expanded Urban Containment Boundary, and less local oversight, in a district that just spent years building an Official Community Plan (OCP) to protect its rural character.

If Langford is any indication, this isn’t just about buildings. It’s about your tax bill. It’s about your roads. It’s about abandoning climate resilience just as the crisis accelerates. It’s about whether North Saanich still feels like North Saanich five years from now.

Tap the link in bio to learn more.
  • North Saanich residents spent years building an Official Community Plan that
  • Fox Guarding the Henhouse: Why Is a Global Real Estate Giant Deciding North Saanich
  • Canada
  • The urban containment boundary is non-negotiable. Here’s why.

North Saanich already has a plan. Not an idea, but a resident-led Official Community Plan adopted in 2025. It directs housing to places with existing infrastructure, protects over 30 percent of land for agriculture, and keeps communities livable.

But that plan is under attack. A Dallas-based real estate company is pushing council to expand the boundary and introduce ad hoc density increases: six-storey buildings, smaller lots, fewer safeguards.

Here’s the thing: residents aren’t rejecting growth. They’re rejecting growth without a plan, without community input, and without local control.

As one resident said at council, “You can’t make a small change to the urban containment boundary any more than you can be a little bit pregnant.”

The boundary isn’t just a line on a map. It’s about whether North Saanich’s agricultural lands continue to feed the regional food system. It’s about whether the district’s rural character survives. It’s about whether growth works with local ecosystems or against them.

Read more - article in comments below.

#KeepItNorthSaanich #RuralByChoice #northsaanichbc
  • North Saanich spent years building its new Official Community Plan with residents. It was adopted July 14, 2025. The OCP already sets housing targets, timelines, and affordability requirements. But now a $2-billion Dallas-based real estate company is pushing to rewrite it.

So why is CBRE trying to gut a plan that residents created, before it’s even had a chance to work?

𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡: what does North Saanich mean to you, and what are you willing to fight to protect?

Drop your thoughts in the comments. 

(Link to the full breakdown in the comments below👇)
  • Another Langford? No, Thank You

Langford was supposed to be BC’s housing success story: build fast, build big, solve the crisis. Instead, it’s becoming a warning.

In just five years, Langford’s property taxes have exploded: 2.95% in 2021, 2.95% in 2022, 12.41% in 2023, then a record-breaking 15.63% hike in 2024, followed by 9.77% in 2025 and 10.22% again in 2026. Three double-digit tax hikes in four years. That’s not bad luck. That’s the bill for growth that outran the infrastructure meant to support it.

Take Westhills, once open land, now home to thousands, which passed 1,000 homes almost overnight. Roads like Alouette Drive turned into commuter chokepoints so bad the city had to install speed bumps just to keep residents safe. Locals are now living through what officials openly call “construction fatigue”: noise, dust, traffic, and neighbourhoods that stopped feeling like home.

Even Langford’s own council admitted the pace had gotten away from them, which is why it adopted a new Official Community Plan in 2025 to try to bring order to growth that had already spiralled.

Now the same playbook is coming for North Saanich. A provincially appointed advisor, paid by a global real estate firm, is pushing six-storey buildings, an expanded Urban Containment Boundary, and less local oversight, in a district that just spent years building an Official Community Plan (OCP) to protect its rural character.

If Langford is any indication, this isn’t just about buildings. It’s about your tax bill. It’s about your roads. It’s about abandoning climate resilience just as the crisis accelerates. It’s about whether North Saanich still feels like North Saanich five years from now.

Read more keepitnorthsaanich.ca

#KeepItNorthSaanich #NorthSaanich #RuralByChoice #SaanichPeninsula #BCHousing
  • Tomorrow is it. After Wednesday, the comment window on the Housing Minister’s directives closes for good, and Council moves straight into drafting its final response.

If you’ve been putting it off, this is the last call. A few honest sentences about what North Saanich means to you is all it takes.

Email CorporateServices@northsaanich.ca and CC AllMayorandCouncil@northsaanich.ca before end of day Tuesday.

Details: keepitnorthsaanich.ca/north-saanich-council-wants-your-input-on-the-housing-ministers-demands-deadline-july-22/

#KeepItNorthSaanich #NorthSaanich #RuralByChoice
  • Three days. On Wednesday at 12pm the window closes and the record is what it is. If you’ve been meaning to speak up about the Housing Minister’s directives, this weekend is the time. What’s actually being demanded, why it matters, and exactly how to submit your comments, all in one place: 

Link in bio for details.

© 2026 Keep it North Saanich

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Keep it North Saanich

© 2026 Keep it North Saanich