• Home
  • Keep it North Saanich
Keep it North Saanich
  • Rural By Choice
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
  • Rural By Choice
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
Keep it North Saanich
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest Post

Flying Blind: North Saanich Suspends the Committees It Asked to Serve

by KeepItNorthSaanich
July 5, 2026
0
398
SHARES
2.3k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A worrying development has made the news in the usually bucolic agricultural and natural heritage district on Vancouver Island. 

 In a surprising twist, meetings of three district committees have been summarily suspended by the council. With 21 volunteer residents these committees give meaning to the public participation principles enshrined in the Official Community Plan, namely: 

“transparent community communication, engagement, and education in recognition of the importance of the community’s collective expertise, knowledge, and creativity.”

 Bill Irving, chair of the former Commission Review Working Group, who drafted terms of reference for the advisory committees in 2024 added: 

“I’m familiar enough with local politics that you don’t [suspend the committees] offhand”. 

Peter Chandler, chair of the Agriculture and Food Security Committee, spoke at the council meeting on Monday, June 29, acknowledging the work of the volunteer committee members, saying the agriculture committee members shared their subject matter expertise ‘generously, openly and collegially.”

Chandler expressed concern at the surprise suspension of the work of the local advisory committees stating: 

 “It was entirely unexpected with no notification to the committee chairs” and added that in his two years as chair of the committee, no one has ever brought forward a concern regarding the conduct of any member.

 Chandler added that critical work on the development of the vital harvest hub working group is now in limbo, and the coming review of the zoning bylaw is now “flying blind” when it comes to agriculture.

 Will the council seek public input into any proposed changes to the OCP or the Zoning Bylaws before replying to the Housing Minister’s report?

If you are concerned about this lack of public engagement by the council on this critical issue, make your concerns known through letters to Mayor and Council or by speaking during the council meetings.

The next council meeting is on 13 July 2026 and the response to the Minister’s housing report is due on 17 July 2026. For context on what’s at stake in that response, see our breakdown of the numbers behind North Saanich’s actual housing needs and supply.

SOURCES

https://peninsulanewsreview.com/2026/07/02/north-saanich-committees-left-in-limbo-as-district-awaits-legal-review/

Previous Post

Fox Guarding the Henhouse:

Next Post

Is This a Joke?

KeepItNorthSaanich

KeepItNorthSaanich

Next Post
Suspended committees, an interim planning director, a taxpayer-funded PR firm. Who is really deciding what North Saanich becomes? Residents want answers.

Is This a Joke?

Categories

  • Latest Post
  • Our Farms
  • Our Forest
  • Our Future
  • Our Home
  • Rural By Choice
  • Four to three. That
  • Public Participation Welcome. Terms and Conditions Apply.

On Monday, September 21, resident Lesley Gould rose at North Saanich council with one question about the most consequential document on the table: Zoning Bylaw No. 1606, brought forward by interim planning director Joe Calenda.

Her point came with receipts. The Planning Institute of BC lists Calenda as a retired member, confirmed in writing by PIBC
  • Every Candidate Has a Team. Only Some Put a Name on It.

Election season brings out the labels: "slate," "machine," "bloc." All three carry the same suggestion, that candidates who run together have given up their independence and take orders from above.

It
  • Langford was supposed to be BC’s housing success story: build fast, build big, solve the crisis. Instead, it’s becoming a warning.

In just five years, Langford’s property taxes have exploded: 2.95% in 2021, 2.95% in 2022, 12.41% in 2023, then a record-breaking 15.63% hike in 2024, followed by 9.77% in 2025 and 10.22% again in 2026. Three double-digit tax hikes in four years. That’s not bad luck. That’s the bill for growth that outran the infrastructure meant to support it.

Take Westhills, once open land, now home to thousands, which passed 1,000 homes almost overnight. Roads like Alouette Drive turned into commuter chokepoints so bad the city had to install speed bumps just to keep residents safe. Locals are now living through what officials openly call “construction fatigue”: noise, dust, traffic, and neighbourhoods that stopped feeling like home.

Even Langford’s own council admitted the pace had gotten away from them, which is why it adopted a new Official Community Plan in 2025 to try to bring order to growth that had already spiralled.

Now the same playbook is coming for North Saanich. A provincially appointed advisor, paid by a global real estate firm, is pushing six-storey buildings, an expanded Urban Containment Boundary, and less local oversight, in a district that just spent years building an Official Community Plan (OCP) to protect its rural character.

If Langford is any indication, this isn’t just about buildings. It’s about your tax bill. It’s about your roads. It’s about abandoning climate resilience just as the crisis accelerates. It’s about whether North Saanich still feels like North Saanich five years from now.

Tap the link in bio to learn more.
  • North Saanich residents spent years building an Official Community Plan that
  • Fox Guarding the Henhouse: Why Is a Global Real Estate Giant Deciding North Saanich
  • Canada
  • The urban containment boundary is non-negotiable. Here’s why.

North Saanich already has a plan. Not an idea, but a resident-led Official Community Plan adopted in 2025. It directs housing to places with existing infrastructure, protects over 30 percent of land for agriculture, and keeps communities livable.

But that plan is under attack. A Dallas-based real estate company is pushing council to expand the boundary and introduce ad hoc density increases: six-storey buildings, smaller lots, fewer safeguards.

Here’s the thing: residents aren’t rejecting growth. They’re rejecting growth without a plan, without community input, and without local control.

As one resident said at council, “You can’t make a small change to the urban containment boundary any more than you can be a little bit pregnant.”

The boundary isn’t just a line on a map. It’s about whether North Saanich’s agricultural lands continue to feed the regional food system. It’s about whether the district’s rural character survives. It’s about whether growth works with local ecosystems or against them.

Read more - article in comments below.

#KeepItNorthSaanich #RuralByChoice #northsaanichbc
  • North Saanich spent years building its new Official Community Plan with residents. It was adopted July 14, 2025. The OCP already sets housing targets, timelines, and affordability requirements. But now a $2-billion Dallas-based real estate company is pushing to rewrite it.

So why is CBRE trying to gut a plan that residents created, before it’s even had a chance to work?

𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡: what does North Saanich mean to you, and what are you willing to fight to protect?

Drop your thoughts in the comments. 

(Link to the full breakdown in the comments below👇)

© 2026 Keep it North Saanich

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Keep it North Saanich

© 2026 Keep it North Saanich